Modi’s Victory to Militarize India Muslims

Amid increasing anti-Muslim sentiments, new signs of radicalizations appeared among India’s Muslim community, though the number involved remained extremely small.

A recently retired US official described Modi to The Guardian as a “lightning rod both for internal and Pakistan-based militant groups.”

BJP extremist comments were adding to Muslim concerns inside and outside India.

Signs appeared last year after videos released by a newly formed extremist group calling itself Ansar ul Tauheed al Hindi and apparently based in Afghanistan or western Pakistan called for violent attacks in India in revenge for 2002 Gujarat massacre and sectarian violence in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh earlier in 2013.

One video, called From Kandahar to Delhi, refers to Indians, who the group said had joined their ranks.

There have also been a series of bombings that have been blamed on a local Islamic militant cell.

Security officials in India are concerned that the imminent withdrawal of US combat forces from Afghanistan will trigger increased violence, especially in Kashmir.

The conflict in Afghanistan has acted as a pressure valve for many of the most extreme groups and the Pakistani security establishment “might feel the need to let them vent”, said Nigel Inkster, at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

The victory of BJP would now wake up Indian Muslims and many of the sleeper cells to a much larger extent. They may now seek to take revenge against the Hindu majority for betraying the country and electing into power a fascist leader. Its not the Muslims who have to fear because a Muslim fears no one but Allah but its the Hindus for following an extremist leader.

3 killed Sikh and Muslim riot in Hyderabad police backing sikhs behind the scene

Curfew was imposed in Rajendranagar police station area under Cyberabad Commissionerate in Hyderabad on Wednesday, following communal clashes and death of three persons in police firing.

Trouble broke out near Sikh Chawni near Bahadurpura, adjacent to the Old City, after miscreants burnt a religious flag in the early hours of Wednesday. Tension gripped the area as members of a community attacked two youths blaming them for the flag burning incident.

At least 2 to 3 people were killed in the police firing.
source
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/two-killed-in-hyderabad-police-firing-curfew-imposed/article6007981.ece


Now the truth:

All the people killed were Muslims because the Hindu majority police and security forces were backing the Sikhs from behind the scenes.

Sikhs gather and raise up swords and daggers. Armed Sikhs set some Muslim houses on fire and caused damage to their property.
Rapid Action Force and Border Security Force officers which were stationed for election security was immediately called in. Paramilitary forces first fired tear gas shells and then opened indiscriminate firing over stone-pelters killing one on the spot seriously giving lethal injuries to 20 others; another youth later succumbed to injury in olive hospital.
Sources claim till now four persons have succumbed to bullet injuries, all of them Muslims.

Sikhs with the police.
Sikhs with weapons in front of the police who are backing the Sikhs.

West trying to destroy india by overplaying rape incidents

This is an article from and American website. Here is the source: http://www.amerika.org/politics/western-elites-pushing-to-destroy-india-with-feminism/

"How do you backdoor Social Marxism into a country? The same way you’d do it here to a small community: invent a pressing problem with a protect victim — gays, women, minorities, children — and demand investigations, public dialogues and other tools designed to make the people there hate themselves.
Then they’ll be grateful when you come in to save^TM them “from themselves.”
Right now, the Western liberal elite media is hive-minding about rape in India. See here, here, here, here, and here (CNN reporting on its own crowd-sourced report).
This fits into the modern narrative of “putting out fires”: overworked, we soldier on, but then we notice a problem so urgent that we must even break out of the normal drudgery of modern life. Rape! That’s as bad as racism… wait, nothing is as bad as racism… it might be racist, but at least one of these victims is white, so… almost as bad as racism. But still very bad.
Finding a problem like this justifies our intervention. It justifies summoning up ten thousand Slutwalks, several Public Dialogues, many collaborative art projects, thousands of investigative journalism pieces, at least a dozen public speeches, and perhaps the sale of 1.2m self-help books about rape, how to avoid it, and how feminism will save us.
And that last point is worth noting: how feminism will save us. The point is to use this justification for action as a backdoor to bring in Western liberal elite-style feminism, which requires a backdrop of Social Marxism, which in turn requires the liberal concept of progress and with a few quick steps, we can dominate this society with our neurosis too.
Cynics like myself think that the point of this expansion is power, with a side dose of “misery loves company.” Or in other words, we’re not going down alone. Everyone must join us in our maniacal quest for Ideological purity and if it destroys us, it will destroy them, and we’ll all be equal in destruction.
But how real are these claims? A helpful BBC article provides some statistics:

It says that the city of Delhi, home to 7.5 million women, recorded 585 cases of rape in 2012, compared with a total of 484 cases from the cities of Mumbai (232 cases), Calcutta (68), Chennai (94) and Bangalore (90 cases). Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta are megacities with populations of more than 10 million people.

Let’s compare that to statistics from major American cities. New York had 1,092 rapes in 2011. Los Angeles had 828 rapes in 2011. Chicago had 1,439 rapes in 2009 (the most recent year they reported statistics). Houston had 771 rapes in 2011.
In other words, Delhi probably has fewer rapes than most big American cities. Where’s the outrage? Oh, we already have feminism. Time for another Slutwalk.
Western elites spread their cancerous liberalism through jihads such as the manufactured “India rape crisis.” By ignoring statistical evidence, and instead picking a few of the inevitable crimes of a big city, the media can make it appear as if a crisis appears where none exists.
The audience for this media, naive in the belief that the news somehow reports on factual reality, will see the increasing frequency of stories and assume that there is an increasing frequency of crime, when in fact the rate of crime is lower than where they live.
However, this gives the left their true source of power, which is socialization. In every chattering circle, people can talk about rape in India as if they knew something. This embarrasses Indians, and motivates them to atone for that by importing Western-style liberalism and with it, cultural Marxism and other forms of social control."

At the moment biased anti-male rape laws have been passed in India with the backing of the media and because of the protests and pressure exerted by many women groups to pass the biased laws, now its a free hand for women. They can go around in semi-naked and revealing clothes begging for attention without any accountability. On top of that  men don't even have the right to look at them there cannot be a bigger hypocrisy than that.
It is a fact that in India there is so much hypocrisy about rape women don't even want to acknowledge 000.1% of the mistake. Read this article for more http://indianmuslimpost.blogspot.in/2013/07/rape-hypocrisy-and-blame-game-in-india.html
How can it be that in 100% of the cases mistake is only one sided? There is always the other side of the coin and at present the biased rape laws don't even look at the other side and pass the judgement.

This is what American style liberalism is which they want to backdoor and spread in every country.
There are more rape cases in USA and the western media is raving about rape cases in India as a strategy and an opportunity to backdoor western style libralism and radical feminism into India.
And its an easy task for them to spread western ideas here in a plagiarized hindu majority country which tries to copy everything from the west.

Mulayam singh and Abu Azmi deamonized for rape comments

Mulayam Singh Yadav said rapists should not be given death penalty. What he meant was recently rape cases have been overplayed in the media and for every rape case women groups demand death punishment but sometimes there is a mistake and for mistakes death penalty should not be given. Mulayam said "men commit mistakes but they can't be hanged for it.'

He emphasized to change biased laws so that those misusing it are punished. There is no doubt that rape and domestic violence laws are biased and against men.

Yadav also said boys and girls fall in love but due to differences they fall apart later on. "When their friendship goes sour , the girl complains that she has been raped," he said, stressing the need for changes in biased rape laws.
It is a fact that many times rape laws are misused and those who take advantage of it should be punished severely.

Within 48 hours Abu Azmi came forward and said if a woman and a man have sexual relationship which only a husband and wife are allowed to have in that case both male and female are punished according to Islam.

He said that rape was punishable by death in Islam.  “Rape is punishable by hanging in Islam. But here, nothing happens to women, only to men. Even the woman is guilty.”
Azmi told the truth it takes two hands to clap. Tali kabhi ek haath se nahi bajti.

He went on to add that, “In India, if you have sex with a person with consent, it’s fine. But if that same person complains, it’s a problem. Nowadays, we see a lot of such cases. Girls complain when someone touches them, and even when someone doesn’t touch them. It becomes a problem then, and the man’s honour is ruined in this. If rape happens with or without consent, it should be punished as prescribed in Islam.”

Talking about the solution to the 'problem' of rape, Azmi said that both, the woman and the man involved, should be hanged.
What he said makes sense because if both sides will be punished then women will start acting and dressing decently and this would stop indecent dressing and provocation. http://indianmuslimpost.blogspot.in/2013/01/hindu-girls-indecent-dressing.html 
At the moment because of biased laws its a free hand for the women. They can go around in semi-naked and revealing clothes begging for attention without any accountability. On top of that  men don't even have the right to look at them there cannot be a bigger hypocrisy than that.
It is a fact that in India there is so much hypocrisy about rape women don't even want to acknowledge .1% of the mistake. Read this article for more http://indianmuslimpost.blogspot.in/2013/07/rape-hypocrisy-and-blame-game-in-india.html
How can it be that in 100% of the cases mistake is only one sided? There is always the other side of the coin and at present the biased rape laws don't even look at the other side and pass the judgement.

This is what American style liberalism is which they want to backdoor in every country. They are now demonizing Abu Azmi saying that he should be hanged for putting his views forward the same so call liberal  and tolerant media who says everyone has the right to his/her views.

There are more rape cases in USA and the western media is raving about rape cases in India as a strategy and an opportunity to backdoor western style libralism and radical feminism into India.
http://www.amerika.org/politics/western-elites-pushing-to-destroy-india-with-feminism/
And its an easy task for them to spread western ideas here in a plagiarized hindu majority country which tries to copy everything from the west.

mistakes but they can't be hanged for it

Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/first-mulayam-now-abu-azmi-latest-rape-remarks-new-low-for-even-sp-1475599.html?utm_source=ref_article

mistakes but they can't be hanged for it

This is what American style liberalism is which they want to backdoor in every country.

Muslim tiger Imran Masood against Narendra Modi

Fearless speech by Imran Masood a politician from Saharanpur against criminal Narendra Modi.
Most of the Hindu majority media is going mad about this speech and criticizing it but we should be proud and support people like Imran Masood and Akbaruddin Owaisi against murderers like Modi.
Imran Masood spoke from his heart and it shows Muslims want people like Modi to be punished.

Mr Masood said
"I dont do politics just siting at home. I am a man of the street, ready to die or kill for my people and friends. I am not afraid of death."
"I can fight against Modi, I will teach him a lesson. He thinks this is Gujarat. There are only 4% Muslims in Gujarat. There are 35% Muslims here. If he tries to convert our land into Gujarat, then we will chop him into pieces."