Monday, 29 July 2013

Dr. Zakir Naik wins Islamic Personality of the Year award



Dr. Zakir Naik the founder of  Islamic Research Foundation has won the prestigious Islamic Personality of the Year award in Dubai.

Dubai International Holy Quran Award held in Dubai was watched by 1.7 million people around the world http://www.khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp


The Dubai International Holy Quran Award, on Friday night changed the Islamic Personality of the Year, for the first time ever in the award’s 17-year history.
Earlier, the award had announced Grand Imam of Al Azhar Dr Sheikh Ahmed Al Tayyeb as Islamic Personality of the year.

Ibrahim Bu Melha, Chairman of the organising committee of the award, said due to the unstable situations and political unrest in Egypt, the award organising committee has decided to postpone honouring Dr Al Tayyeb to later years in response to his request.

"Instead, the award has chosen the popular Indian scholar Dr Zakir Naik as the Islamic Personality of the Year in appreciation to his tireless effort in the service of Islam and Quran."

Dr Zakir, who is also a surgeon, is the founder and president of the Islamic Research Foundation. He has written two books on Islam and comparative religion. He is regarded as an exponent of the Salafi ideology.

In an interview with Khaleej Times last year, Dr Naik said all of his children - one son, 18, and two daughters, 16 and 14, have memorized the Holy Quran in full, have black belts, speak Arabic fluently, and study Islamic sciences. They are combining religious and world knowledge together.

“My son is even better than me; I only give lectures in English and Urdu, but he additionally speaks Arabic and sign language fluently. He also fully memorized the Quran unlike me. Also, my wife is giving Dawa in English and Urdu. Thanks to Allah, all my family members are calling from Islam.”
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/ramadannews
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/zakir-naik-named-islamic-personality-of-the-year-1.1214199


India may have banned Dr. Zakir Naik because of the influence of Hindus in the country controlled by Hindus but still Zakir Naik is loved by millions of Muslims in India and around the world. India Muslims came out and protested against the ban of Islamic scholar Dr. Zakir Naik in India.
Because of Dawah, lectures and speeches by Zakir Naik thousands of Hindus willingly accepted Islam which most Hindus didn't like. Many Hindus were agitated by him, there was a conflict between Dr. Zakir Naik and Hindu majority in India as a result Hindu organizations openly and secretly pressed for his ban and finally the government banned him because of the pressure from Hindu majority denying Mr Naik the freedom of speech.

Batla house encounter verdict Muslims upset by injustice

 As it was feared the court has convicted an innocent Muslim in Batla house fake encounter case. The court accused Shahzad Ahmed on charges of obstructing public servants in discharge of duties, murder of Inspector MC Sharma and attempt to murder.

Jamia Teachers' Solidarity Association (JTSA) which was formed in the wake of the Batla house police shootout in 2008, in its initial reaction, has expressed disappointment at the conviction. Most of the members of the JTSA, including Manisha Sethi, Sanghamitra Misra, Tanveer Fazal were present in the court.

Speaking to TCN from Azamgarh over phone, Dr. Javed Akhtar, President Association for Welfare, Medical, Educational and Legal Assistance (AWMELA), that is fighting the case on behalf of Shahzad too was "disappointed." He said that once the sentencing is announced on July 29, they will discuss the case minutely with their lawyers, adding that they will definitely appeal the conviction in the high court. He accepted that it is a "set back in their struggle for justice" and that media reports in last few weeks that the prosecution was not very convincing in providing evidence in support of their version, had made them hopeful and they were expecting a judgement in favor.

In what could be big relief to the Delhi Police, the court has accepted the police version of encounter. Shahzad Ahmed, Special Cell of the Delhi Police, claims was one of the occupants in the L 18 house in the Batla House, where the alleged encounter took place on September 19, 2008, six days after serial blasts in the city. According to the prosecution, he fired at Inspector Sharma and than escaped from the the House L 18 in Batla House, where the 'encounter' took place in 2008.

RTI activist Afroz Alam Sahil, who was first one to get copies of those killed in the police shoot out, is still hopeful of 'justice.' He said, "This judgement is from a district court and we still have the options of high court and the Supreme Court," adding that he firmly believes that in this country justice may be delayed, but is seldom denied.

SQR Ilyas, General Secretary of the Welfare Party of India, said that he is "dismayed" at the judgement, where all legal procedure has been put aside and the court accepted the police version, taking no cognizance of questions raised.

Civil society groups have been arguing that the L-18 flat in Batla House area has only one exit which was manned by police people; there is no possibility to escape by jumping. Anyone attempting that would only break his bones. Further that the local police was not informed in time and that the FIR was filed very late.

Dr Zafarul-Islam Khan, President of All India Muslim Majlis-e Mushawarat said in a written statement that it is too early to comment as we do not know in detail what the judgment really says. Questioning the police version, however, he said, "The 'input' for Batla House came from the same infamous IB special director who provided the fake inputs that were used for 17 fake encounters in Gujarat which are being probed now," adding, "We continue to beleive that the Batla House encounter was fake and we stand by our demand for a high level judicial enquiry into the incident."

The court faild to answer why inspector sharma was not wearing bullet proof jacket.
The court, during the arguments, questioned why Sharma was not wearing a bullet-proof jacket when he knew that he was leading the team to catch terror suspects and why two police officers were not carrying arms.
"Police had already information, receiving which a raiding party was formed well in advance. Despite all this, Inspector M.C. Sharma did not wear any body protection device i.e. bullet-proof jacket. Moreover, at least two members of the raiding party were having no weapon with them, despite knowing the fact that they may face firing."
"It is not clear whether it was merely a misadventure or lack of professionalism in Delhi Police or scarcity of weapons," the judge said.

Digvijaya Singh in his statement said "I stick to stand that Batla House encounter was fake."

Mohd. Firoz Alam said we will appeal in higher court against this verdict.
http://www.firstpost.com/youspeak/public/muslims-will-answer-through-their-votes-for-batla-house-verdict_3845.html

Facebook page "I believe the 2008 Batla House encounter was FAKE"
https://www.facebook.com/BatlaHouse

Manisha Sethi explaining why she thinks the Batla House Encounter was fake.

This case is far from over Muslims will appeal in higher court against this injustice. Muslims have been tolerating this nonsense and bias for far too long. It is not something new in this Hindu majority country where innocent Muslims in the past have been time and again framed and charged for terrorist activities.

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

Cow Slaughter hypocrisy


Hindus consider cow as holy and they oppose cow slaughter. In India the legality and illegality of cow slaughter depends on the state.
Some States allow the slaughter of cows with restrictions (like a 'fit-for-slaughter' certificate which may be issued depending on factors like age and gender of cattle, continued economic viability etc.). Others completely ban cattle slaughter, while there is no restriction in a few states, most notably Kerala. 
Banning is absurd and it cannot stop cow slaughter for meat, it is secretly carried out in spite of the ban.

Hindus believe that cow is a very valuable animal at it gives milk which is used in so many things like dairy products.
The thing to be noted here is that dairy cow or a cow which gives milk is very expensive and no one slaughters expensive milk giving cows. The cows which are slaughtered are the ones who stop giving milk or become old.

The hypocrisy is that Hindus slaughter other animals like goat as holy sacrifice in many temples but they don't want Muslims to slaughter cows.

Hindu religion is a pagan religion they consider cow as holy as their gods. Every country in the world slaughters cow for meat. Beef is widely consumed meat all over the world.

Beef is very nutritious and delicious food.
Beef is a unique, special food. It offers a vast array of protein, vitamins, and minerals that are all essential for a healthy diet. It can be found in many low-fat cuts. There is no other single food that provides the same variety of health benefits found in beef. A serving of beef is a good, healthy addition to any diet. Beef is a great source of protein. Protein is great for providing the body with long-lasting energy. Protein is used by the body to maintain cellular functions, and so it is a vital component of any diet. One ounce of beef offers about 7 grams of protein. A daily requirement of protein for adults is approximately 46-56 grams. So, one three-ounce serving of beef a day can make up a significant portion of the necessary protein in a diet. Protein is not the only vital nutrient in beef, though. Beef is has an amazing variety of other important vitamins and minerals. Iron, a key mineral that helps get oxygen to all body cells, is found in abundance in beef. Beef is one of the best sources for iron, and can be especially good for pregnant or lactating women, who need increased iron stores. Many people suffer from iron-deficiency anemia, which can cause fatigue, headaches, and tiredness. Eating beef is one of the best ways to combat iron deficiency anemia--the large amount of iron found in beef makes it uniquely suited to benefit people with low iron. Some of the important vitamins found in beef include several B vitamins, including B12, folate, thiamine, and riboflavin. These B vitamins are essential for many body functions, and are especially important for converting food to energy. In addition to these essential vitamins, beef also offers vitamins E, K, and D. These vitamins are used in various important body functions. Vitamin E is an important antioxidant, and Vitamin K is vital to blood clotting and bone health. There are many important minerals found in beef, besides iron. These include potassium, calcium, zinc, and magnesium. The minerals found in beef are important for many essential body functions, including muscle, bone, and cellular functions. Many people are afraid that beef is a high-fat food, and avoid it. However, there are many cuts of beef that are classified as lean. Some of these cuts are eye round roast or steak, top sirloin steak, and tri-tip roast or steak. These cuts of beef are widely available at supermarkets, and many of them are very budget-friendly. Beef can be a healthy, low-in-fat part of the diet. Beef is an wonderful, healthy food. It provides an amazing amount of nutrition, even in a small serving. Beef is a great staple for a well-balanced diet.
http://www.beef.com/nutritional-benefits-of-beef

Its high time that they understand cow slaughter is not different from goat slaughter for meat and cow is not holy, it is just like any other animal.

Hindu forces behind Bodh Gaya Blasts ?

RTI Activist Aroop Brahmachari says Hindu organizations known for terror mischief, Bodh Gaya Serial Blasts could  be their handiwork.

The Indian media which is largely controlled by Hindus is quick to point the finger at Muslim organizations without any proof. They are presuming that this blast is a reaction to the killing of Muslims in Myanmar.  Even if this comes out to be true than what has Indian government done to stop the killing of Muslims in Myanmar ? Instead there are allegations that Hindu fundamentalist organizations are secretly encouraging Buddhists in Myanmar to carry out the killings.

Aroop Brahmachari said Hindu organizations have  been involved in terror activities in the past and the role of Hindu organizations in this cannot be overlooked.

The timing of the bomb blasts is crucial because just one day before the blasts Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi said - Nitish Kumar government should be taught a lesson for breaking alliance with the BJP.  
Digvijay Singh rightly pointed out that that there could be Modi's hand in the blast.
The beneficiary of this blast is BJP and it can now lift a finger on Nitish Kumar's government.

Monday, 15 July 2013

Muslim employees allowed to leave office early

HYDERABAD: Muslim employees in all state departments and schools have been permitted to leave at 4pm everyday during the month of Ramzan to perform 'necessary rituals', a general administration department release said.
The relaxation of rules came into effect from Thursday and will end on August 8. Outsourced employees would also have this benefit.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-12/hyderabad/40535207_1_office-hours-employees-ramzan 

Hyderabad is the stronghold of the AIMIM and you may see the benefit of having strong Muslim party in Hyderabad who thinks about Muslims.
Ramzan is a sacred month for Muslims, this should happen in every state and not just Hyderabad.

Thursday, 11 July 2013

Shariah Courts in India

Muslims in India welcome Islamic legal and moral code that is sharia. Sharia courts are there in may parts of India and now Mumbai has also got its own Sharia court.
is no doubt that most Muslims around the world want to be governed by sharia law which was also revealed in a survey. Sharia law is a great law and it was practiced during the golden period of Prophet Muhammad.
Muslims should follow sharia law as it is a divine law, laws made by men are not above sharia because sharia law is mentioned in Quran and Hadith. Non-Muslims talk about freedom but they don't like Muslims practicing sharia which they are entitled to. In Europe Muslims want to follow sharia, Muslim women take pride in wearing burqa and hijab but the Europeans don't like it and they call for banning it. In India non-Muslim are against Sharia courts but Muslims should not get bothered by what others say and continue to follow great Islamic culture.

MUMBAI: The city is set to get its first Darul Qaza or Shariah court to settle civil and marital disputes in the Muslim community. The court, set up by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, will be inaugurated on Monday at Anjuman-i-Islam, near CST, and will serve to fill a long-felt need of the community.

Shariah courts already function at many places in the country, such as Hyderabad, Patna and Malegaon. Here qazis appointed by the AIMPLB hear the community's various disputes, barring criminal cases, and deliver judgements. "This court will function to settle mainly family disputes pertaining to marriage, divorce and inheritance. Marriage disputes will be settled quickly and the couples will be told to either reconcile or separate if reconciliation is not possible. It will save the community much time and money as fighting cases in civil courts is expensive and time-consuming," said AIMPLB secretary Maulana Wali Rahmani.

For a dispute to be heard by a Shariah court, both the parties in the dispute will have to approach the court. If one of the parties has approached a civil court, then it will have to withdraw the case for the Shariah court to accept the matter.

Rahmani said Shariah courts do not compete with the civil courts. "On the contrary, Shariah courts will lower the burden of the civil courts where thousands of cases are pending and the judges are overworked," he said.

Senior advocate and head of AIMPLB's legal cell Yusuf Muchalla called the city's Shariah court a "significant alternative dispute settlement mechanism". "This court will decide within the framework of Muslim personal laws and mainly deal with matrimonial disputes. This is a kind of domestic tribunal set up by the Muslim community." He added that district and high courts in Bihar, Jharkhand, Bengal and Orissa have upheld several decisions given by the Shariah courts established by the Imarat-e-Shariah (House of Shariah) headquartered in Patna. Muchalla maintained that the Shariah courts were well within the law of the land.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-04-29/mumbai/38903151_1_courts-darul-qaza-matrimonial-disputes

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Chinese troops intrude break security cameras, not incursion says Govt

The incident took place on June 17 when a Chinese patrol intruded into the Indian side and dismantled the cameras set up in Chumar.
A little over two weeks ago, Chinese troops intruded into the same areas in the Leh-Ladakh sector that had sparked off tensions in April and threatened the locals in Hindi. The troops even broke the high-resolution cameras that the Indian Army had set up in the area a month ago.
Sources in the security establishment said the cameras had been put up after the Indian Army dismantled some of its structures following the resolution of the stand-off in April. While the army dismantled the tin sheds it had set up, it quietly set up high-resolution cameras to monitor any Chinese movement on their side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

The Chinese patrol was proficient in Hindi and threatened locals, asking them to vacate the area, claiming it to be their own. The incident was reported to the government by Indian intelligence agencies and confirmed by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police.

India raised the issue of missing camera at a meeting of border personnel two days later on June 19 and China returned the non-functional camera earlier this month, government sources said here on Tuesday. 

Chumar, located 300 km from here, has always been an area of discomfort for the Chinese troops as this is the only area along the Sino-Indian border where they do not have any direct access to the Line of Actual Control(LAC).

Earlier the 21-day face-off between the two sides in the remote Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) sector on April 15 was triggered by construction of an observation tower in Chumar division which had to be subsequently dismantled by the Army on May 5 before the crisis was defused.

The Chinese side in flag meetings in the last week of March this year, had been objecting to the construction of the watch tower along the LAC in Chumar.

After dismantling the observation post and defence bunkers, Army had installed cameras to monitor movement of Chinese troops along the LAC, a step which had irked the PLA.

  
Seeking to play down the incident, government sources were not inclined to describe it as an "incursion" in the disputed territory where perceptions about the Line of Actual Control (LAC) differ. 

This shows the how coward the Hindu majority government is they don't even have the courage to describe this incident as an incursion.

Evey time India seems to bend in front of the Chinese. Prior to this incident when the Chinese intruded, Indian government accepted Chinese terms and the Indian army dismantled their own watch towers and bunkers as the Chinese wanted.

Each time the Chinese does something the Hindu majority government downplays the incident and says it is not an incursion, the area comes under disputed territory.

The government sometimes says that the area is an integral part of India and when the Chinese take action the coward Government led by Hindus in fear start saying that the area is disputed territory.

In all of this, it looks as if there is no use of having weapons and such a large army when they cannot even put pressure on their enemies. Moreover the army looks like a sitting duck.

Even small countries like Japan and Vietnam have far more courage than Hindus, these countries also have disputes with China but they never bend in from of the Chinese.

This shows that Hindus cannot rule. You may check their history throughout the history Hindus were ruled by others which is not a surprise.
While Hindus rant about this on the internet posting very aggressive comments about the government but the truth is that they can only say it behind their computer screens and can never come out.

Had there been Muslim rule in India or a government led by Muslims the story would have been different, they would never have acted like cowards. The concern is that Muslims don't get crushed in between all this only because of the mistakes of the government let by Hindus. Muslim government would be far better for this country.

Sources
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/chinese-incursion-in-chumar-indian-posts-vandalised/article4898339.ece
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1858822/report-dna-exclusive-hindi-speaking-chinese-troops-intrude-into-india-again-break-security-cameras

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

Rape hypocrisy and blame game in India

In India there is a lot of hypocrisy and blame game surrounding rapes. No one is justifying rape here but Indian non-Muslim women simply don't want to take any kind of responsibility what so ever and they only blame others. Blaming others is not going to solve the problem.

The attitude of Indian non-Muslim especially Hindu women is very stubborn  and irresponsible:
Anthony

Attitude #1
We will wear anything we want, we can even roam naked on the road and men shouldn't even
look at us.

Dressing with responsibility and modesty  is needed in India.
This is an ambivalent attitude of women, they amble wearing skimpiest of dresses but don't expect to be watched by unpleasant person but they want to be ogled by selected men whom they like.
Everybody will see the chicken with same eyes, its like showing a red rag to a bull and expecting it to be calm and composed, its the nature no one can control, ask yourself ,don't you feel amorous when u see an extraordinary handsome guy, if its not happening seriously its time for medical checkup.

Its funny, saying we will wear anything we want but don't stare at us is biggest paradoxical statement I have ever heard.
You think men are feeling-less eunuchs, when they see a woman in figure revealing clothes, they don't feel anything or get provoked ? The word “provocative clothes” can you think into why it
 was named so ?

While wearing clothes, for both men and women, as per the very natural instincts they will always think that how the opposite sex would find them- attractive, beautiful, hot etc. Now here is the point, if the opposite sex would not find them attractive they would be highly disappointed. So subconsciously or consciously they would want the Men to look at them. Its obvious that the men would look at the revealing body parts as it attracts them. Thinking is something which we cannot predict, as both men and women sometimes may have wrong notions about each other by seeing the appearance, for example; a guy wearing sleeveless t-shirt or an undershirt outside, would be considered by lots of women as showing off his body or a hoodlum. which may not be the case. thinking inside the brain we cannot change. There is a lot of hypocrisy in India.

Hindu girls surely wear clothes to please themselves and also to attract the attention of other men, no girl can ever deny that (except for those who are lesbian or homosexual), but still if men look or feel  aroused, they will quickly judge them, paradoxical. Knowingly sometimes they would arouse or provoke men but then as per women, men should not look or pass comments. Its a fact that sometimes some non-Muslim women really like to show off their body same as like some men. Here women can look pass comments and have fun and even tease, but if a man looks then its an insult for them and as per women, men should not do that, this is really contradictory.

So this is the logic of Indian non-Muslim women - "I will wear a micro mini skirt even to the extent that u can see my undergarment but you will not get aroused, its not meant for you, I can dress up the way i want."  So does she dresses up like that to please herself or her female friends?  See how hypocrite, double standard and contradictory Indian non-Muslim women are.

It seems as if now Indian men before leaving their homes everyday should pray to God that please don't show me girls in less clothes as it diverts attention and causes hormonal tides which could get us in trouble. Its not easy for a decent person to control his amorous thought, he has to fight really hard to avoid spiking testosterone and adrenalin level.

Attitude #2 
Indian non-Muslim women say drinking does not cause rapes.  They justify drinking, going to
bars and pubs.

Now this is what such women need to look at.
These are statistics of USA, a country which they try to copy.
Drug use, especially alcohol, is frequently involved in rape. A study reported detailed findings related to tactics. In 47% of such rapes, both the victim and the perpetrator had been drinking. In 17%, only the perpetrator had been. 7% of the time, only the victim had been drinking. Rapes where neither the victim nor the perpetrator had been drinking were 29% of all rapes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#United_States
So even in a country like USA most of the time rape occurs when either the victim or the perpetrator or both the victim and the perpetrator are drunk. In many cases in India too we have seen that the rape victim was drunk.

Attitude #3
They say 'we can roam on streets even at 1'o clock at night and and no one can stop us.'

Sure no is stopping you but even if the police or anybody else advises them not to roam on the streets after 11'o clock they get fumed. See the stubbornness here.
This is not Europe this is India and Indian roads are not safe at night, all kinds of criminals and junkies roam on roads at night and its absolutely impossible for the police to secure each and every inch of the city and to keep an eye on every single person. Non-Muslim girls don't understand the situation and behave irresponsibly and when they get raped then every one starts blaming the police and others.
These girls are trying hard to copy western culture. In Europe and USA I have seen there is very little difference between day and night as opposed to most Indian cities which remains totally shut at night and looks like ghost cities.

Attitude #4
Putting all the blame entirely on the police and others involved.

Non-Muslim women in India do not even accept 0.1% of the mistake. Sometimes it also becomes the responsibility of women not to be in places where there could be a threat like roaming on streets at 12' o clock, going to pubs and bars especially at night.
You are trying to confront a basic feeling with which people are born with – hunger, thirst, a need to be recognized, carnal pleasures etc.. are needs of a man. You can't say I will put an aromatic Biryani in front of a hungry person and yet expect him to move over and blame him entirely for trying to have at least a spoon of it.
The blame is shared,  men for trying to have something not his, and the person who put it in front of him to have incited the act.

Attitude #5
Close minded and stubborn attitude.

These girls say that they are very open minded but actually they are closed minded because they don't want to change themselves they say they can do anything they want they can even roam naked on the streets and wear anything its their choice. They justify all the immodest and dirty activities like drinking, going to pubs and bars etc and yet expect no one to even look at them.
They  don't want to change themselves and even if someone advises them to dress decently and be modest they get raged and on the other hand they want men to entirely change themselves, shows how closed minded they are. Its like 'you do everything and I will do nothing and still I will get all the salary'.
They are not willing to even take a single step to change themselves, learn some modesty in dressing and change their attitude in public but they expect men to change their basic nature and walk hundred miles.
Change cannot take place overnight they also have to take some steps otherwise the problem can never be solved.

Attitude #6
Indecent protests and blame game.

Non-Muslim girls in India carry out indecent protests, Slut Walks are on a rise. These kind of protests are not going to solve the problem except spreading indecency.

The Delhi gang rape protests looked like anarchy. Initially the protests were peaceful but later it  became violent, protesters even killed one police man. 99.5% Non-Muslim people were protesting against Congress government and asking for the rapists to be hanged. But government doesn't have the power to hang anyone. It is the job of the judiciary. They even demanded changes in rape laws which again is not in the hands of the government and cannot be done overnight, its in the hands of the parliament. So the logical thing would have been to protest outside the parliament and Delhi high court.
Every country no matter how democratic it may be tries to suppress protesters. USA and countries of Europe are very harsh on such protests. The congress government was very patient and lenient that they allowed protests to continue for so many days in spite of the protests causing law and order problem, disrupting transportation, death of police man etc...
The rape victim and her boy friend were wounded and unconsciously lying on the road side for hours. People who saw them did not do anything, they just watched them and moved ahead. So people who saw them didn't even call an ambulance, for hours they were lying on the road side. That was precious time for the victim, the rape victim could have survived had any one called the ambulance instantly.
Why didn't the protesters protest against those people ? Hypocrisy isn't it.  They protested against the Congress government as if the government was god like and controlled everything.  Congress government handled the situation very well, their hands were tied government can never punish any one its the job of judiciary and congress doesn't control judiciary, its a separate institution but those goons were protesting and threatening the government to hang the rapists, how absurd when government doesn't have the power to do so.
Protesters should have attacked the parliament, overthrown the constitution and then hang the rapists instead of protesting against the Congress.

Slut Walk is useless, it started from Canada and USA and it couldn't the problem there how can it solve the problem in India. USA is still the country where highest number of rapes occur.
In such protests they only blame others like hypocrites using vulgar comments and fail to put forward any kind of solution, blaming others is not going to solve the problem.

Attitude #7
They try to copy western culture and what people in the west do.

Even their dressing sense has become entirely western and all the things like going to bars, discos and drinking  has also been copied from them.
This is what they need to look at.
USA is a country where most number of rapes occur. It is a country where they say women have a lot of freedom but USA is at number 1 position as far as rapes and sexual crimes are concerned.
India is at the second spot but USA is too far ahead of India in terms of rapes followed by some European or non-Muslim county.
 http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/quick-click/which-country-has-the-highest-reported-incidents-rape-data

In United Kingdom, according to a news report on BBC One presented in 12 November 2007, there were 85,000 women raped in the UK in the previous year, equating to about 230 cases every day. The 2006-07 British Crime Survey reports that 1 in every 200 women suffered from rape in that period. It also showed that only 800 people were convicted of rape crimes that same year, meaning that less than 1 in every 100 reports of rape led to a conviction.  According to a study in 2009 by the NSPCC on young people aged between 13-18, a third of girls and 16% of boys have experienced sexual violence and that as many as 250,000 teenage girls are suffering from abuse at any one time. 12% of boys and 3% of girls reported committing sexual violence against their partners.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#United_Kingdom


No Muslim country like UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar  etc.. is in the list of top ten. Women in these countries cover themselves, dress modestly and are under the blanket of  great sharia law which is the safest for women.

Our noble Quran rightly pointed out in Quran Surah 4 verse 34 - Men are maintainers of women men have the right to instruct them and don't let them disobey and go to towards the wrong path.
Arabic:
Arrijalu qawwamoonaAAala annisa-i bima faddalaAllahu baAAdahum AAala baAAdin wabimaanfaqoo min amwalihim fassalihatu qanitatunhafithatun lilghaybi bima hafithaAllahu wallatee takhafoonanushoozahunna faAAithoohunna wahjuroohunnafee almadajiAAi wadriboohunna fa-in ataAAnakumfala tabghoo AAalayhinna sabeelan inna Allaha kanaAAaliyyan kabeera
 
Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34

As we have seen non-Muslim Women are hypocrites so are their men. Hindu men are supporting their women in dirty slut walks and Quran surah 9 verse 67 tells the truth about hypocrites.
Arabic:
Almunafiqoona walmunafiqatubaAAduhum min baAAdin ya/muroona bilmunkariwayanhawna AAani almaAAroofi wayaqbidoona aydiyahum nasooAllaha fanasiyahum inna almunafiqeena humu alfasiqoon

The hypocrite men and hypocrite women are of one another. They enjoin what is wrong and forbid what is right and close their hands. They have forgotten Allah , so He has forgotten them [accordingly]. Indeed, the hypocrites - it is they who are the defiantly disobedient.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=9&verse=67

The country which they try to copy so hard  ie; USA is at top position in terms of rape.
They even copied Slut Walk which is a western concept. Slut walks couldn't solve the problem in USA how can it solve the problem in India.


Indian non-Muslim women, especially Hindu women have to change themselves and shape themselves according to India and not thy to imitate the west.

"When you blame others, you give up your power to change." - Dr. Robert Anthony
When you blame others, you give up your power and responsibility in a situation. You are making yourself the victim. .
Anthony
Robert
>
>